In Jin Yong's "Sword with Royal Blood", there is a Taoist priest in Sang Mu who has high martial arts, but thinks he is better at chess. He calls himself a "ever-changing chess player", but in fact he is just a rotten chess basket, and his level is probably similar to that of Jin Yong himself. It is said that Mr. Zhang Taiyan evaluated himself as "medical ethics first, politics second and academics third" in his later years. Even a person who is deeply involved in Yu Xiansheng like me can't say anything, because even his own wife never dares to eat the prescription prescribed by Mr. Zhang Taiyan.

There is a saying on the Internet that "Don't take your hobbies to PK other people's majors", but there are many such people now. For example, if you learn a little physics in middle school, you dare to challenge relativity; After reading several sci-fi articles with unknown sources, I dare to deny Darwin. These things are now called "people's subjects"-in fact, people's subjects are not terrible. Most people know that such people have a mental problem, that is, adding a little funny words after dinner. However, there is another kind that is very scary. Once "celebrities" in some fields are keen on their "hobbies", it is quite crazy.

"Master of Chicken Soup" Soda Root Kampo, South China and Zhu Qingshi.

For example, some rich people can have many followers as part-time life mentors; Some politicians talk about culture and knowledge, but they can also fool many people. In our field, a Lama who graduated from a university in the western region talked about Einstein and quantum theory in his chicken soup; After reading several Buddhist scriptures in South China, does a chemistry academician dare to create "quantum Buddhism"? In fact, they are all just jokes, but in the eyes of their fans and even many members of the public, it is a truth worth looking up to!

I used to think that the humanities field, more precisely, literature, history and philosophy, are inseparable, and the promotion of the three is knowledge; Later, I found that sometimes I still have to score a point. At least some philosophers talk about history, which is quite funny. -many "post-modernism" in the west, because they hold a nihilistic and disillusioned attitude towards real life and society, write books and make statements, but they are also a family statement, because how you want to live is your own business, and others can't control it. But later, when their "hobby" spread to the field of history, many "strange theories" appeared. For example, they think that the history you see is "constructed" by power struggle, gender consciousness and class prejudice, so there has never been a real "history". Their followers in China often read two Foucault's books and dare to think they are proficient in history, but in fact they know almost nothing about literature and textual research.

In my opinion, due to the author's cultural background and his own tendency, there may be some intentional or unintentional bias and deviation in historical narrative. But as a whole, it has its own set of strict norms similar to detective science and jurisprudence. As long as we adhere to this norm, the conclusion is naturally quite effective. For example, in my early years, I read a book about the Boxer Rebellion written forty or fifty years ago, which said that the purpose of the Boxer Rebellion was to "clear the ocean". In fact, if you look up the book, you will know that all the records are "helping to clean up and destroy the ocean"; Also, since the "alliance" at the end of 19, many people have been beautifying the "Taiping Heavenly Kingdom", but their tyranny and theocracy are also known by casually looking through historical materials. Therefore, postmodernism and its disciples say that historical facts are unknowable, but in fact they are just too "theoretically confident", plus, lazy.

Playing philosophy, it is strange to talk about history as a "hobby"; I have also seen postmodern monarchs talk about Buddhism. For example, in a group of "national studies", someone talked about the Heart Sutra with 260 words for more than a month, which was very exaggerated. In fact, he did not know the source of the literature, nor did he understand the basic concepts such as Buddhist history and name. There are so many "creative interpretations" that the author doubts whether he has read the False Heart Sutra at ordinary times. -but this way of speaking, there are many followers!

The reason for this phenomenon is not difficult: celebrities, at least those who have achieved something in some aspects, are already confident in their own circles and have many fans, so they are often praised as useless. So, slowly, I really feel that I know everything, others are stupid, so I am the smartest, so your "major" is not as good as my own "amateur" to play, so these "amateur masters" were born. -the most typical, like emperor Qianlong's 40 thousand imperial poems, and so on.

I remember the old man in Tang Zhi said that the worst thing in the world is that scholars talk about martial arts and soldiers talk about literature. In all other fields, this is not the case!