20 17 The famous doctor Bian Que was deleted from the new history textbook. Does this mean that Chinese medicine is deceptive or useless? That's not the reason. The real reason is that it is still a problem to research whether Bian Que, a famous doctor, really exists in textbooks with a rigorous, scientific and responsible attitude. In recent years, primary and secondary school textbooks have been revised many times. It is worth mentioning that the most deleted articles are actually Lu Xun's articles. Of the 1978 junior middle school Chinese textbooks published by People's Education Publishing House, 9 are from Lu Xun, accounting for 5.9% of the total. In 2009, this proportion dropped to 3.9%; 20 13 returned to 5.3%. Among the 96 texts of 1978 in the senior high school Chinese textbook published by People's Education Press, 8 are works of Lu Xun, accounting for 8.3%. After 2004, there were 3 articles left by Lu Xun, accounting for 4.6% of 65 articles. It is an indisputable fact that the number of Lu Xun's works in textbooks is decreasing day by day.

According to various historical records, he has treated famous doctors such as Tian,,, and so on. However, if we look at the birth and death years of these historical figures, we will find that there is a long time difference. If the story is true, then Bian Que will be a super birthday girl with a life span of over 200 years. This is obviously unscientific. The same is true of other figures, such as the ancient poet Qu Yuan, whose existence cannot be verified. Zhang Heng's seismograph is actually a copy model, which failed to realize its function.

The most important thing in history education is to attach importance to facts. Even if it is inevitable to look at history with a personal view of history, we should try our best to build on facts. Reduce the indoctrination of preset positions and ideologies.