Author: superpro007

Mr. Lu Xun once said that China people are good at making a cage and then lying in it to sleep, which reminds me of those ostriches who bury their heads in the sand to avoid the enemy safely. This habit of China people is not only reflected in actions, but more importantly in thoughts.

For thousands of years, from rulers to ordinary people, China people have always taken it for granted to conquer the world. In fact, this "reason" is not "taken for granted", but a contradiction.

Speculation is actually very simple:

Suppose we conquer the world, it is right to sit on it.

Since you think this truth is correct, then in order to sit still in the world, of course you have to fight for it.

But when you are a farmland, isn't the world already shot down by others? If you really think it's right to conquer the world and wait for death, then you should respect the right of others to fight and wait for death. Don't fight!

So the contradiction is clearly in front of you:

In other words, if we admit the principle of "conquering the world and enjoying the success", we will come to the conclusion whether to fight this contradiction or not!

According to scientific principles, if a' theory' draws contradictory conclusions, then this' theory' is wrong.

So the conclusion can only be that the "theory" of "conquering the world and enjoying the success" is wrong.

Since it is wrong to think that' conquering the world and enjoying its success', what should we do if someone conquers the world and enjoys its success?

-Sure, just hit him!

What about after the fight? If we sit by ourselves, we should be beaten by others.

A history of China, that's all. You hit me, you sit, I hit you, I sit, I sit, he hits, he hits, he sits, and so on.

From rulers to ordinary people, we have never realized that the real way out of the historical cycle is to "fight without sitting"!

In fact, the reason for adopting this method is simple:

The theory of "conquering the world and sitting in the world" is wrong, of course, the theory of "conquering the world without sitting in the world" will be correct; Or the theory of "sitting in the world without plowing" may also be right. This is just like 1+ 1 is wrong, so 1+ 1 is not equal to 3, which is of course correct.

Because if you conquer the world and don't sit down, then you have at least shattered a wrong theory in real life, which is of course a great achievement. Generally speaking, China people who were "alive" at that time probably didn't expect to make such a feat.

Therefore, now take the facts to carefully demonstrate the correctness of these two theories.

Let's look at the theory of "conquering the world instead of waiting for death":

In fact, in the process of "farmland", who contributed the most and paid the most? It's the martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the new world! They have been buried in the ground, as Mao Zedong said, "It's sad to think about it". Excuse me, are these people who "conquer the world" sitting in the world? Or' not sitting in the world'?

Since "people who really plow don't actually sit in the world", it is logical to plow instead of sitting in the world. How can a person who is not so "real farmland" be qualified to sit? I find it hard for you to let go.

Moreover, even those who have participated in farmland are still alive, in fact, there are examples of not sitting in the world.

Washington should be regarded as one of the people who fought for America. If someone advised him to be king, he would certainly refuse. Later, when I wanted to be president, I worked for two terms with an inevitable attitude, and then retired to my farm. Doesn't this prove that this is correct for the United States?

After the Revolution of 1911, Sun Yat-sen and Huang Xing retired from politics to engage in industrial construction, but Yuan Shikai, Chiang Kai-shek and others decided to take a seat again. Didn't the result prove wrong? After Chiang Kai-shek, we certainly can't do this. Didn't the "Great Comrade Mao Zedong" say that "we have found a way to jump out of the cycle rate, and this is democracy"?

The mistake made by Sun Yat-sen and Huang Xing is that they only make China people feel that it is wrong to be emperors, but they don't tell China people that the "truth" of "conquering the world and enjoying the success" is also fundamentally wrong. As a result, someone beat the world, but he didn't call himself the emperor. He just sat quietly.

As a matter of fact, people who really conquer the world will never be able to dominate the world.

Let's look at the theory of "sitting in the world instead of sitting in the world":

This theory of "sitting on the ground and not cultivating the world" is actually very common. China people all know that' the world is public, the world is public', but they just know it, but they didn't think of it. And think about it, who is not the' world'? Aren't you? Am I not? Isn't he? Since everyone comes from all corners of the country and the world belongs to the whole world, there is naturally no need to fight. The world was originally ours.

Therefore, the so-called "conquering the world and enjoying the success" is actually a betrayal of the natural principles of the world! ! ! Some people are robbing others of their share of the world. It is not so much "conquering the world and enjoying the success" as "robbing the world and eating for yourself"!

And the vulgar, ugly and contradictory truth of "striving for the world and eating for yourself" has been sincerely followed by us from the rulers to the ordinary people in China for more than 5,000 years! Sadness. . .

In fact, if we go back to the natural animal kingdom and have a look, we will know how ridiculous China people are:

Monkeys also follow the "truth" of "conquering the world and enjoying the success". Which monkey king among monkeys doesn't fight or sit? But they are purer and more thorough than us in China. The Monkey King did fight, but he did not deprive other monkeys of the right to compete for the Monkey King (for example, killing all nine families or depriving them of the ability to compete for education, etc.). Secondly, he didn't stubbornly pass on the throne to his children and grandchildren or people he liked, but actually sat there waiting for the next strong monkey to challenge himself.

This is very reasonable.

But we in China refuse to talk about this truth. If we sit by ourselves, we will deprive others of the right to sit wholeheartedly, and we will trick others into believing that we are destined to do so. Anyway, we refuse to engage in fair competition, and our brains are worse than monkeys.

So when I was reading history, I was really surprised to see someone reprimanding Xiang Yu for being crowned by monkeys. Because China people are really not as good as monkeys, and he said that Chu people are monkeys and I am Chu people, which is really great praise! Poor Xiang Yu, that bastard, actually cooked him! In fact, foreigners later said that "China people in Hunan are Prussians", and there is a saying in China that "when the whole world dies, Hunan people will die"? This simply means that Hunan people are not as good as monkeys among China people.

On the other hand, I think it is really good that people can really have the Monkey King's mind and tolerance. Otherwise, what is the use of wearing a layer of human skin?

We China people should learn from monkeys first and stop being ostriches.