? No matter how history is written, it always has its meaning. Although there is nothing wrong with pursuing truth, we also need truth very much, but when we emphasize truth, we will naturally lack some interest. Such a dull book is really hard for the public to chew, and its long history is not conducive to the popularization of this kind of knowledge. So in my opinion, this kind of history books is more suitable for hiding for reference and textual research.

? As a usual reading, individuals tend to like interesting historical stories, just like the popular costume TV series and historical novels. This kind of reading materials insert some artificial love stories into the overall historical framework or recombine some folk legends, just like adding a little salt and vinegar to a bowl of white rice to make it more to our taste. And I admit that I am often attracted by these so-called things that deviate from history, and I have accumulated some historical knowledge by accident.

Of course, there are also some historical classics, which actually express their feelings and opinions in the name of history. There's nothing wrong with that. It is a good thing that we readers can learn some life truths from them, or be inspired by such classics.

What we need most as modern people is an open mind. As the saying goes, "the heart is wide, the world is wide." We should be able to accept or appreciate all kinds of things, but we also have our own ideas.

So it doesn't matter how history is written. The important thing is that I know what I want.