(A) the overall threat of the United States to China's security
The United States posed a serious threat to China's security and fought with China. Judging from the national nature and strategic objectives of the United States, especially the policy trend after the end of the bipolar pattern, the essence of the containment faction and the contact faction is an attempt to delay China's rise as a world power. For this reason, the United States has created troubles for China in political, economic and military aspects, and even encouraged and incited neighboring countries to confront us, thus becoming the country that poses the greatest threat to me in the security environment around China.
1. Politically, step up the implementation of the strategy of "westernization" and "differentiation"
The American ruling group believes that the growing strength of socialist China will eventually pose a "threat" to the interests of the United States. The United States regards me as the main obstacle to its hegemony and clearly lists me as one of the global strategic opponents after 20 15, so it has always been hostile to me. The essence of its China policy is to induce pressure with both hands and promote change with both hands. In the final analysis, it is an attempt to finally bring China into the western system. Politically, the United States will continue to use Taiwan Province Province, Tibet, human rights and other issues to contain me and intensify its westernization and division. Economically, it tries to integrate me into the world economic system dominated by the United States according to the American model, and at the same time strengthen the economic infiltration, control and suppression of me.
2. militarily, comprehensively contain and prevent us.
The United States is the number one military power in the world. In recent years, taking advantage of its absolute economic and military advantages, it has stepped up its efforts to play chess with Puckilo around China and made strategic arrangements for prevention and containment. By strengthening military alliances, we will infiltrate neighboring countries and gradually narrow the military siege of China. From a series of events since the 1990s, such as US arms sales to Taiwan, Yinhe incident, Kitty Hawk incident, US aircraft carrier formation interfering with our exercises, missile attack on our embassy in Yugoslavia, and plane collision incident on Hainan Island, we can see that among the possible opponents I face, the threat posed by the United States is the biggest, overall and long-term. Almost all the problems I face in security have the background of the United States, and most of the disasters are in the United States.
3. Take advantage of the problems in Taiwan Province Province for strategic containment.
In recent years, the United States has more blatantly pursued the substantive "one China, one Taiwan" policy and secretly supported the "Taiwan independence" activities, with the aim of using the issue of Taiwan Province Province as an important strategic bargaining chip to contain China. The position and policy of the United States on the issue of Taiwan Province Province is a serious obstacle to the reunification of China, and it is also an important source that may induce political turmoil in Taiwan Province Province. Militarily, marked by the provision of advanced weapons, expand arms sales to Taiwan. The United States and Taiwan Province have also strengthened military cooperation and personnel exchanges to improve Taiwan Province's military skills in reconnaissance, surveillance and early warning.
(B) Japanese potential and real threat to China's security.
Sino-Japanese relations are very important. Friendship and mutual benefit are the mainstream of the development of bilateral relations. However, it is an indisputable fact that Japan poses a threat to China's security environment, both from the historical perspective and from the perspective of reality and development.
In the past century, among the world powers, Japan did the most harm to China. At present, the focus of Sino-Japanese friction is on four issues: historical issues; Diaoyu Island issue; Taiwan Province Province and Japanese Military Expansion. In recent years, the negative factors in Japan's China policy have obviously increased. With the further enhancement of Japan's economic and military strength and the continuous expansion of its political ambitions, Japan's potential and real threats to China's security are on the rise. The East China Sea issue exists between China, South Korea and Japan, which has caused many disputes so far. There is also a territorial dispute between China and Japan in the East China Sea-the Diaoyu Islands issue. The issue of the ownership of the Diaoyu Islands has recently intensified, which has strained relations between the two countries.
(3) India's invasion and threat to our territory.
The border between China and India has never been formally demarcated, and no treaties and agreements involving the specific location of the border between China and India have been signed. But India insists on the McMahon line in an attempt to occupy a large part of our territory. Therefore, the border territorial dispute led to the border armed conflict in 1962, and then the two countries were politically opposed and militarily confronted for many years. Since the mid-1980s, the two countries have conducted many border negotiations, but so far no substantial progress has been made. In recent years, India's comprehensive national strength has greatly improved, posing a greater threat to China's rear area.
(4) Territorial disputes and security threats between neighboring countries and China.
1, Russia
Generally speaking, Sino-Russian friendly relations have developed very well. However, when analyzing the Russian influence on China's security, we should take history as a mirror. Russia and the former Soviet Union plundered Xinjiang scholars the most seriously. We should remember Russia from generation to generation, the country that has invaded our territory the most.
2. Three Central Asian countries
The three Central Asian countries are all members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, so the friendly relations between China and the three Central Asian countries are long-term and stable. However, there are still realistic border territorial disputes between China and the three Central Asian countries. At present, the border issues with Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan have been basically solved, and the border territorial dispute with Tajikistan is under negotiation.
3. North and South Korea
China has disputes with North Korea and South Korea on the continental shelf of the Yellow Sea. The Yellow Sea covers an area of about 380,000 square kilometers and is a shallow continental shelf. At present, the boundary of the continental shelf of the Yellow Sea has not been demarcated.
4. South China Sea countries
Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and other countries claim that "the South China Sea is the sea of Southeast Asians" and at the same time do not recognize China's sovereignty over the Nansha Islands. Vietnam even insists on "sovereignty" over the Xisha Islands. At present, all countries adjacent to the South China Sea except China have declared the establishment of territorial sea, exclusive economic zone and continental shelf. Some countries have also announced the baseline of territorial sea, and some neighboring countries or opposite countries have also signed demarcation agreements. In China, islands are occupied, sea areas are divided and resources are plundered.
Solutions to the surrounding environment
Through the analysis of the surrounding environment, we find that despite so many threats and so many eyeing eyes, the possibility of a large-scale war is still very small. To say the least, no matter which country goes to war with China (especially on a large scale), it will be harmful to both sides. Because China is the first consumer market in the world, countries that pose a threat to China are squeezing China's high profits every year. It can be said that having a hard time with China means having a hard time with money and having a hard time with yourself. Besides, China still has nuclear weapons. If you want to fight, you have to weigh it first and see if it's worth it. Generally speaking, countries are in a delicate balance, and current security is not a problem. Therefore, we should focus on development, especially the rapid improvement of comprehensive national strength.
When history has come to 2 1 century, and our country has moved towards rejuvenation, it is necessary for us to be calm. We still have a lot of things to do on the road to rise, which cannot be solved in a day or two. We don't just have Taiwan Province Province, Nansha, Diaoyu Island and the East China Sea to solve, because these are just survival problems. Defending national sovereignty and territorial integrity is an unshirkable task of a country. At the same time, we should look further. As a big country in revival, we should also attach importance to the acquisition of the right to development. Because only development is the last word.
I think for the United States, we must understand the weakness of the United States. That is, the fact that Americans' concept culture and strength culture coexist gives us an opportunity. This is an important breakthrough direction of our future national strategy. There are not many weaknesses in the United States, which is a big weakness. We must make good use of it. And Americans are unlikely to make any big changes to their weaknesses in a short time. After all, it is a national habit. Inertia is something that exists in any nation and cannot be changed just because someone has discovered it. In the diplomatic process, we should try our best to attack the justice of American actions. In this way, the determination of the United States to take action can be greatly reduced. Obviously, the direct result of reducing America's determination to act is to greatly reduce America's ability to intervene. This is a question of specific steps. At the same time, we should also play the role of strength logic. If we can't stop Americans ideologically and culturally, then we should adopt strength constraints. As long as we make the United States feel that they are not worth the loss, American logic will generally not act rashly. However, Americans are very powerful. It is also foolish for us to compete with the United States for sphere of influence too blatantly. Such behavior is illogical. We must make America think that our purpose is small. This depends on strong operational ability to cooperate. Americans are not stupid, so our operation should be political, economic and military, so as to maximize the effect. Militarily, first of all, don't appear aggressive, but have the military strength to meet the needs. This thing is also quite difficult to grasp. In this regard, we should mainly adopt some policy statements to hide military strength. Although it may not play a big role, it will always play a role. In order to show that we don't want to completely break the old rules of the game, we just make changes within the acceptable range of the United States. At the same time, we should strengthen economic ties with the United States and concentrate on developing our own economy. Our economy is larger, and our economic ties with the United States are closer, so the United States is relatively more dependent on China. One of our priorities for the United States is to try to avoid war with the United States, especially all-out war. In the future, we should not try to completely push American power out of a certain region. In short, getting rid of the big fish in America is no longer a problem. Japan does not have nuclear weapons, not to mention other countries, while Russia has stood on the same front with China, maintaining a delicate balance, focusing on economic construction, and strengthening its own strength to see who dares to bully us.