Of course, teachers' water quality and personal charm are also different.

But more importantly, their identities are different.

Look at those university teachers who have lecture halls. Some don't teach history at all, such as Yi Zhongtian. What he said on TV is entirely out of interest, and he can be unrestrained.

Others have great freedom even if they teach history.

University teachers teach history classes, and the test papers are all produced by themselves. After the exam, they are approved by themselves, which is more casual.

And sometimes the last two classes give students a question, and everyone is very happy. In other classes, they will find topics that students like to talk about, which is as interesting as talking about cross talk.

Of course, there are also some history teachers who are ignored in universities and have no motivation to give students good lessons. These people are just muddling along.

Seeing middle school teachers is completely different.

History teachers in junior high school or senior high school before the placement of arts and sciences are very clear about their position. Their classes are often taken away by the main teacher. When they don't take them away, they also know that the students below are not listening, doing homework, chatting or sleeping.

Can they still be interested in having a good class at this time? Read it according to the textbook.

Netizen 2:

What about the history teacher after liberal arts class? The status has improved, and everyone is in class.

But they can only talk about the contents of the book.

A class lasts only a few minutes, so we should tell students where to recite and where to focus as quickly as possible, and we should also analyze the test paper and emphasize the answering skills repeatedly.

Many history teachers have goods in their bellies and can talk a lot, but they dare not.

Because those who didn't take the exam, the students wrote it down and didn't grade it on the test paper, not to mention some historical research results that were completely different from what they learned in the textbook, as well as those unofficial history and lace news, so they didn't have time to get to the point. How does the teacher talk?

I am a history major in high school, so I am lucky. History teachers in junior high school and senior high school are very attractive, with good voices and cadence, and can try their best to capture students' interest within the scope permitted by the examination syllabus, but not every teacher is capable or willing to do so.

Therefore, if you are really interested in history, you should read books by yourself.

Netizen 3:

This is actually related to the teacher's own knowledge, teaching skills and work seriousness.

First of all, the subject of history must be extremely boring for people who don't like words.

Among my college classmates, there are many high school students who study science, and they can't find the key points of a thoroughly analyzed text in the history books.

For such a person who is naturally insensitive to words, it will be extremely difficult to learn if he meets an irresponsible history teacher again!

Many teachers know nothing but books.

When I was in junior high school, I met an English word in an extracurricular book and ran to ask the English teacher. The English teacher doesn't know. As a result, the math teacher sitting next to the English teacher looked at it with great interest and then said the meaning of the word.

At that time, I was still young and didn't pay attention to the English teacher's face, but it certainly didn't look good when I remembered it.

Some teachers have a good idea of topic selection, and the starting point is also in line with students' ideas.

When I was in high school, the geography teacher never brought a textbook to class, but he could tell us every word in the textbook, and then he told us all kinds of geography anecdotes.

History teachers in high schools are different. The lecture is read completely according to the textbook and has no own language. This kind of class is not as good as learning it yourself.

Netizen 4:

Before college, history teachers talked about general history and taught it according to the syllabus, so they didn't have time to extend history to students.

Naturally, it is even more boring.

It's like Yuan Tengfei went to a lecture hall and made up lessons in a famous school to talk about history. He can talk about many things outside the textbook to attract students. It is also because it is a make-up class that students have already studied at school. He just helps students deepen their understanding and connect the knowledge points of high school history.

In the lecture hall, Wang Liqun read historical records, Yi Zhongtian tasted the Three Kingdoms, Song Fengyun in Yuan Tengfei, Ji Lianhai talked about the Qing Dynasty, and teachers talked about other history. These are detailed explanations of a certain period or some people in history, basically more than 20 or 30 periods, each of which has more than half an hour.

According to their way, students have to live for a lifetime with four books, namely, high school history class, ancient modern history of China and ancient modern history of the world.

Besides, Lecture Room is originally a mass communication program, so it should be more interesting to arouse the interest of non-history majors. Otherwise "Lecture Room" can't survive without ratings!

The history class before college is to popularize historical knowledge and historical concepts. If you are really interested in history, you can read books by yourself, or choose a history major after college, or listen to university teachers. In universities, history teachers are also specialized in research, and they all have their own research directions. Lectures are also to explain students' research in detail, which is naturally more detailed, interesting and in-depth than the general history of high school.

Netizen 5:

In middle school, because of the pressure of exams, the content of each class is very substantial, and teachers can't have much time to help you get into the state gradually, which is very different from TV programs. The length of TV programs is similar to that of a class, but it contains relatively few knowledge points.

Moreover, in TV programs, there can be all kinds of jokes flying all over the sky, which is rare in real teaching, and teachers can easily speak them in a relaxed tone, which is completely different from middle school history teachers.

Moreover, in terms of content, the teacher may choose some interesting examples, which will easily arouse everyone's interest. However, middle school history teachers can't let interest prevail. They must explain every knowledge point that needs to be tested very clearly, but the knowledge points to be tested are not necessarily so interesting, so many people lose interest.

Netizen 6:

There is a simple reason.

Teachers have strict syllabus norms, teaching progress, take care of the progress of parallel classes, and more importantly, follow the baton of the college entrance examination.

What to test, what to teach, and what to teach in textbooks.

Moreover, middle school teachers have to cope with lectures in class and check teaching plans, and the progress should be consistent.

This is the red line of middle school teachers (not just history), which is related to the amount of bonuses and the stability of professional titles.

Universities are different. Lecture halls are simply subverting the concept of "teaching" (teaching activities should be interactive), and more academic debates are completely different from the focus of teaching (for example, there are more than three possibilities for the death of Guangxu, can middle school teachers say so).

The altar master gushed, rambled and turned around. Anyway, the TV broadcast, how many people watch it, how many people like it, how many people spit it out, and the ratings are high and low. Everything has nothing to do with him. Take the money and leave.