I think the first thing is to be interested. Only when you are interested in history will you take the initiative to study history. Don't hold the psychology that I won't study until I take the history exam. Interest is a very subtle thing. With interest, you can quickly remember knowledge points, understand and comprehend the historical laws behind historical phenomena, and analyze historical problems with ease. On the other hand, it is tantamount to suffering in the blast furnace of Taishang Laojun, but it cannot be refined.
Then how can students who are not interested in it be trained like this? First of all, you should try to put your mind right and don't always contradict. If so, God can't save you. Then, think about the historical dramas you have seen before. Students with good history can even ask a history teacher to talk about this historical drama from a historical perspective, and you will find many interesting things that you didn't know before. The most important thing is that you can find that history is not boring, but interesting. Finally, if you listen to more history classes, you will find that the history teacher in our school is not bad. Although I can't guarantee that you will fall in love with history, at least I believe that you are interested in history classes.
Of course, if you have interest, you can only get twice the result with half the effort without good learning methods. Many students think that the key to learning history is rote learning, which is wrong. What high school history needs more is understanding. Understanding based on textbooks. So what is important is how to build a historical structure that is easy for you to understand. In fact, this is also very simple. When reading the contents of each section, we should think about what happened before and after a historical event, whether there is any internal connection between them, and what historical truth can be explained. Historical events can also be compared horizontally and vertically. For example, what are the similarities and differences between two coups or two policies? Why are there such similarities and differences? What does it mean? It is also very simple to analyze similarities and differences, which is nothing more than thinking from several fixed plates such as background, nature and influence. Some books say that history should be studied in three dimensions. I think the so-called "three-dimensional" is probably the connection between horizontal and vertical. If we often think like this, we can analyze the essence of different historical phenomena more accurately and solve any problems we encounter. This is a problem that should be paid attention to when reading. Books are more than just reading. It's no use remembering some times, places and events. The most important thing is to learn to think and study with historical thinking and explore what is behind the incident. I believe you will soon find that the more you read, the more interesting you will be.
Because we have to face the exam after all, we will never shy away from the question of exam skills in the process of talking about learning history well. Nowadays, there are few historical questions that simply test knowledge itself. This is usually a test of your analysis of an event. This requires the use of the set of kung fu accumulated during reading, and there are also some skills.
For example, when doing multiple-choice questions, we often encounter some problems such as "root" and "essence", which are usually analyzed from the aspects of productivity determining production relations and economic base determining superstructure. As long as there are options about these aspects, they are generally correct. As for the question and answer, you need your thinking and analytical skills. The first is analysis. Try to think about this problem from more angles by recalling the teacher's introduction when he talked about this part. Don't worry about thinking too much, as long as you think it makes sense, it may be right. What's more, the current exam has repeatedly stressed that "students should be encouraged to play freely, be brave in innovation and have their own opinions", so you should think as much as possible. The most taboo is to think that you can't write anything. Finally, when answering questions, the handwriting must be clear. Answer clearly and logically. Don't be wordy about every point, but be sure to give the main points in general. Every point should be marked with a serial number so that it can be clear.