As we all know, in Stalin's era, the Soviet Union implemented a highly centralized planned economy (referred to as Stalin's model, and later many socialist countries were also gods), and implemented a centralized management system in industry, giving priority to the development of heavy industry; In agriculture, the collective farm system is implemented. This system played a huge role during the war, but before and after the war, this system brought great harm to the people (especially farmers)! (Not discussed). After hershey came to power, he made bold reforms to this system! 1, cancel the compulsory payment system for farmers on collective farms. In Stalin's time, in order to give priority to the development of industry, this man forced farmers to pay a certain amount of food voluntarily, which made farmers' lives poorer and their enthusiasm for labor and production almost lost! Soviet agriculture was lower in Stalin's time than before the 10 revolution! Is this the superiority of socialism to farmers? Hershey is wise. After he came to power, he was relieved of his agricultural obligations under various pressures. It can be said that in that era of limited knowledge, crazy socialist production and popular personality worship, it was a kind of courage and courage! At the same time, Hershey launched the reclamation movement, which reclaimed tens of millions of hectares of cultivated land and increased the grain output of the Soviet Union. Exempted farmers from the obligation to pay money, and reclaimed land increased food. It is conceivable how the living standards of farmers are. (only one year of poor harvest) 2. Appropriate industrial decentralization policy. Before the reform and opening up, we never properly decentralized industry. When I read that Hershey did the same thing 56 years later. I can't help applauding it! Hershey's policy made industrial production go smoothly, the output value gradually increased, and the initiative and flexibility of enterprises improved. Perhaps many people have seen this, but if they are in power, under that economic system and social conditions, few people dare to do anything, and who wants to be labeled as revisionist by others. Your position is much more important than risky reform! Second, political and personal style. 1, oppose personality cult and rehabilitate the injustice of the purge. 1956 At the 20th National Congress of the Soviet Union, Hershey threw out a secret report (which was familiar to everyone), severely criticized Stalin and rehabilitated those who had been wronged in the great purge. This is a great pioneering work! ! ! Reaffirm the principle of collective leadership of the party, so that the tragedy of Stalin's personality cult will not repeat itself in the history of the Soviet Union. 2. The tenure system for cadres was abolished. This is the product of Stalin's dictatorship. This man not only dictators himself, but also cultivates a group of small dictators who put on airs! ! The central government appoints cadres, but does not stipulate the term of office! What kind of system is this (even in research institutions)? These people, whether elites or idiots, can always enjoy the treatment of cadres as long as they are in office and live forever! After hershey took office, he reformed this malpractice, resumed the election (in any way), developed education at the same time, and trained a large number of talents for the socialist Soviet Union, so that many people with poor families and low social status could study and enter government departments or scientific research institutions through their own efforts, thus achieving social equity to a certain extent. I still appreciate Hershey's personal style. In the early 1960s, the Soviet Union suffered a poor harvest (I can't remember which year it was), and politicians criticized Hershey's reclamation policy (due to the failure of experimental corn planting, part of the reclaimed land was reduced, resulting in poor harvest). In order to prevent people from starving, Hershey used the national gold reserve to buy grain from developed countries in Europe and America. Let's think about it. Will Stalin do this? Doesn't it mean admitting that you are wrong? How can a leader be wrong? In order to realize the "great ideal" of his collective farm, Stalin forced farmers to yield and sold food like a foreign country during the famine! ! Animal behavior! ! Kill people for their own purposes! What is it! Hershey values not himself, but human life. I admit my mistake and correct it. The most important thing below is how to remedy, how to let the people tide over the difficulties, not to preserve their dignity! This is the truly great leader. At the same time, politically, Hershey does not engage in centralization. 1964, when Hershey steps down, the process is simple. After a simple Politburo meeting, hershey was forced to resign. When he got home, he said, "That's it. If it is Stalin, they will all be arrested. " From then on, he spent his old age on a pension. Isn't such a person worthy of admiration? Generally speaking, I think Khrushchev is a person who really cares about people's sufferings, attaches importance to national development, and strives to improve national strength and people's living standards. During his tenure, he carried out reforms and significantly improved the living standards of the Soviet people. At the same time, he did not engage in God-making movement, dared to challenge incorrect theories, and was able to remedy his mistakes in time, not to save face and bring disaster to the country and the people! He is an excellent leader of a respectable socialist country. Of course, he also has shortcomings, such as low educational level, blunt speech and carelessness in diplomatic occasions. At the same time, due to the limitation of system and historical environment, his reform only eased the contradiction of Stalin's model, but did not fundamentally solve it. Maybe Hershey is not capable of solving this problem.