The new era is a major transition period of China's economic and social development, and it is also a period of accumulation and evolution of social contradictions. Various social contradictions accumulated in the past long-term development, such as uneven regional development, uneven distribution of income and wealth, deterioration of ecological environment, and strengthening of resource constraints, will gradually accumulate. In the future, there will be new contradictions and challenges in the process of China's economic and social transformation and development, such as the decline in economic and income growth, the intensification of polarization between income and wealth, the rapid aging of the population, the weakening of the sustainability of the social security system, and the changes in residents' demands. The external development environment of China's rise will be more complicated and changeable. This series of old and new contradictions will become a major challenge for the innovative development of social governance in China in the new era. In particular, the rapid aging of China's population structure will have a huge impact on traditional intergenerational relations and family relations, and put forward higher and higher requirements for social management services; Economic transformation and development will lead to great changes in the economic structure, and structural unemployment and the imbalance of new regional economic development will have a conductive impact on social governance; Solidification of social strata, declining mobility and polarization between the rich and the poor will lead to frequent social contradictions; The people's growing demands for rights also put forward new requirements for social governance; Network society and big data technology are changing the fields, means and methods of social governance in all directions. Network security and risk issues are increasingly prominent, and online and offline interact with each other, infiltrating into economic, political, cultural, social, ecological and other fields, becoming the key and difficult areas of social governance.
Facing a series of risks and challenges, the system and mechanism of social governance in China must be constantly innovated and developed in the future.
First, establish the road confidence, theoretical confidence and institutional confidence of Socialism with Chinese characteristics's social governance system. We must adhere to the rule of virtue and the rule of law. Pay more attention to the important role of the rule of law in social governance, and persist in coordinating social forces, balancing social interests, regulating social relations and standardizing social behavior on the track of the rule of law.
The second is to grasp the laws and trends of future social development and improve the level of socialization, rule of law, intelligence and specialization of social governance. We will continue to develop and improve mechanisms such as deliberative democracy, public hearings, consultation supervisors, government venture capital and purchase of services, multi-party public welfare funds, social organization autonomy, and family style guidance, expand the scope of political and social interaction, and improve the socialization level of social governance. Accelerate the legislation in the field of social governance, strengthen the guarantee of the rule of law, use the thinking and methods of the rule of law to resolve social contradictions, and improve the level of legalization of social governance. Give full play to the role of the Internet and big data technology in social governance, take the concept of linkage and integration as the guide, pay more attention to facility connectivity, information exchange, power convergence and resource sharing, and improve the informationization and intelligence level of social governance. Give full play to the positive role of social workers, lawyers, "village elders" and "township saints" in social governance, accelerate the establishment and improvement of social psychological service system, and improve the professional level of social governance.
The third is to comprehensively strengthen the construction of social governance system and innovate diversified governance mechanisms. It is necessary to give full play to the leading core role of party committees at all levels in taking the overall situation and coordinating all parties in social governance, and form an organizational mechanism to ensure the benign and orderly interaction between government governance and social self-discipline. Establish and improve the basic system of social governance, improve the construction of service-oriented government, adhere to the unity of safeguarding rights and maintaining stability, and promote social governance in service. Establish an institutional environment to guide and promote social forces to participate in social governance, bring social forces into the social governance system with an open structure and market-oriented mechanism, improve the openness and transparency of public decision-making, and form a fashion of public active participation in social governance.
The fourth is to improve the assessment and incentive mechanism of social governance and implement the leadership responsibility of social governance. It is necessary to give full play to the guiding and promoting role of social governance assessment results in social governance work, establish a power list and accountability system in the field of social governance, form an evaluation and incentive mechanism for effectively implementing social governance leadership responsibilities, and truly urge party committees and governments at all levels to put social governance work on an important agenda, thus forming a social governance situation in which * * * manages people and rewards and punishments are clear.