In the process of collecting materials and editing teaching materials, he found that Xuanhe Bao Tong coins existed in the reign of Emperor Xiaowen, but not for a long time. "Song Huizong's Xuan and Bao Tong are very impressive and recognized, while Emperor Xiaowen's Xuan and Bao Tong may be controversial."
Zhang Huai also said that as a textbook, the content should be authoritative and recognized. Next, he will consider deleting this graphic when revising the textbook next year.
Extended data:
Is Gu Zexing's query about ancient coins a mistake in the notes of textbooks? Experts explained:
Fu, a researcher at the Shanghai History Museum and the seventh director of the Chinese Coin Society, bluntly said, "This is a serious injury": "If you have some knowledge of numerology, you can find this obvious mistake. "Xuanhe Bao Tong" is not the currency of Emperor Xiaowen of the Northern Wei Dynasty. The pictures and explanations in the book are all wrong, and the textbooks for primary and secondary schools need to be scientific and rigorous. "
The titles of Emperor Xiaowen of the Northern Wei Dynasty in Fu Shuo were Yanxing, Taihe, and there was no "Xuanhe". Xuanhe was the sixth national title of Song Huizong in the Northern Song Dynasty. Xuanhe Bao Tongqian was cast in Xuanhe period (A.D.119 to 1 125) and made of bronze and iron. Xuanhe Bao Tong has small flat money and double money. And the positive text "Xuanhe" includes regular script, official script and seal script.
Thesis-A junior high school student in Shanghai pointed out that the currency used in history textbooks was wrong, and the editor admitted that it was inappropriate and it would be deleted.