In the final analysis, the history of human society is the history of ideological development? What is the reason why this sentence is wrong? Urgent! (for Marx's exam)
After all, it should be the history of the development of human productive forces. Material first, the economic base determines the superstructure, and what kind of productivity determines what kind of superstructure. The ideology and politics of human beings belong to the category of superstructure, and the historical essence of ideological development is the history of the development of material or productive forces. It is wrong to assume that the history of human society is ultimately the history of ideological development.