1. The first two sentences of the first question say that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait will be reunified for a long time, and peace is the most important thing, and war should be avoided as far as possible. The third sentence says that a strong country can stabilize society and make people feel safe. I won't explain the last sentence.

What is the overall central idea of this poem? To "revitalize China", how should we revitalize China? Peaceful rise is only the development policy of the mainland, referring to cross-strait peace! That is to say, to revitalize China is not only the responsibility of the mainland, but also the responsibility of Taiwan Province Province. Isn't the premise of rejuvenating China the reunification of the country?

Option b can only embody "rejuvenating China", but not the words "cross-strait" and "common responsibility", so C is chosen.

2. The second question

First of all, if we want to find out what they have in common, we should first divide their guiding ideology or guiding ideology.

During the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Movement, there was an important ideological guidance called "Land System in China", which clearly mentioned that clothes should be worn together, rice should be eaten together, fields should be cultivated together, and money should be spent together. Such a unified concept includes the people's basic necessities of life.

The guiding ideology of the Revolution of 1911 is "Three People's Principles": nationality, civil rights and people's livelihood. Nation is a broad concept, in fact, it is the power to unite all China people. Civil rights are personal rights that people want, so people's livelihood needs no explanation.

The New Democratic Revolution refers to the Great Revolution 19 19-1927, the Agrarian Revolution 1927- 1937 and the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression period 1937. The guiding ideology of this stage is Marxism–Leninism.

Can we find common ground? Two words "people's livelihood"

Option a is obviously wrong. Did the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Movement promote the democratization process in China? It is clearly written in the history books that the Tian Ping Movement only delayed the semi-colonial and semi-feudal social progress in China.

The so-called democratization process can only be advanced if the advanced class attacks the old class.

I don't know if you can understand what I explained. If you have any historical questions, you can ask me. In other words, my historical score in the college entrance examination is 148. Although my math score is only 50, it can't stop me from boasting that I know a lot about history, hehe!