I thought the emperors in front of the Western Han Dynasty and the Eastern Han Dynasty were all good. Liu Heng Liu Qi (the rule of Wenjing, though it is to stabilize the country or something, is enough to reflect the will of the people) and Liu Che (a famous emperor in history) in the Western Han Dynasty, with the foreshadowing of Wenjing, the Han Dynasty became very good and powerful. Ahem, people get confused when they get old, so I won't comment anymore. ) Oh, I seem to have forgotten Liu Bang. Although I don't think he is diligent, loving the people and selfless, personally, I think he is good at pretending and playing the art of emperors smoothly. Liu Xiu was in the Eastern Han Dynasty, diligent and loving the people!

Li Shimin in the Tang Dynasty (initiated the rule of chastity and political clarity)

In the Ming Dynasty, Zhu Youtang was actually a good emperor = =, and all the previous emperors died earlier, so his fame was not very great, but he really worked hard and loved the people, creating a short prosperous time in the Ming Dynasty.

Kangxi and Yongzheng in Qing Dynasty

There are many emperors in history who are good, but I prefer the Han Dynasty. . Not to mention the disadvantages of history-most emperors have their own advantages, not absolute.

Finally, because I have worked so hard to type so many words, I beg to adopt QAQ.