Evaluation of historical figures:
The first part: Summarize what kind of person he is in one sentence, such as: XX, XX also (this is an ancient law, you should not start with such literary grace, you can say that he is an outstanding XX family in the history of China, who was an official in XX and died in XX and posthumous title), and then sketch out his death year (the year of birth and death), what nationality and historical evaluation of him (historians and folk people can choose).
The second part: Introduce his life story (a few important events, as a topic), and then analyze the character's character in combination with his growth process and living environment, and explain why he is such a person and why he is engaged in these "important events". At the same time, the articles or quotations he left behind when he experienced these things reflected his mood, feelings and ambitions at this time.
Part III: His influence on the historical process and later generations.
Assess historical events:
The first part: explain the historical environment (time, dynasty, place) in which it happened, and its influence on the historical process and future generations. This part is referred to as the whole argument.
The second part: according to the historical environment (targeted and selective refining), analyze why this event happened (why did it happen at this time? Who is the organization? Event progress analysis? Because of what? What was the result? ), if you are writing an academic paper, on this basis, analyze the growth environment and psychological characteristics of the main characters and refine the above aspects. It is best to quote the original words of history books as evidence, and it is best to quote some similar viewpoints of similar papers, but the source should be indicated.
The third part: the influence on the historical process and future generations (from political changes, economic culture, life technology, etc.) should be fully written. It is best to quote the comments of historical figures on this incident to increase the persuasiveness of their own views. It can also be explained from the dialectical point of view of Marxist philosophy, but not too much, otherwise the academic paper will become an official meeting.
These three parts are not three paragraphs, so don't make them into eight-part essays. The second part focuses on narrating and explaining the causes of this history in detail, and the third part focuses on discussing and comprehensively analyzing the significance of this history.