First of all, when a military commander still has heavy troops to defend, there is no crisis at all and there is no crisis. When military commanders are not fully armed, they are either hacked to death by the enemy or hacked to death by their own people (think of Li Mu, Tan Daoji and Yue Fei, just like surrendering).

Secondly, if a country really has excellent generals, it will basically not decline too much, so it is not these military commanders who come to show integrity (think of Wei Qing, Huo Qubing, Ban Chao and Xu Da, who played so well and didn't have a chance to surrender).

Finally, China was dominated by civil servants in ancient times, and the top officials of the imperial court were dominated by civil servants. Arvin's astrology may be well known, but didn't the middle and lower generals who died in the Southern Song Dynasty have any integrity? No fame. Besides, by contrast, why did the official of the Qing Dynasty have a civil servant like A Wen Tian? Therefore, in terms of probability, it is unreasonable that civil servants will be more moral.

There are also some famous soldiers who are respected and regarded as the pride of the nation even if they surrender.

Excavate-turned to Li Shimin, and later became the first star in the early Tang Dynasty.

The story of Yang Ye-Yang Jiajiang became a household name after he moved to Zhao Kuangyin.

There are many other examples. Think carefully about why these surrendered stars are still respected. Because their surrender is only an act, in order to unify the country, stop the war and protect people's livelihood, these people would rather give up their personal honor and disgrace. How can we say that these people have no integrity or car-scrapping?

I've just been sorting out relevant information recently, hehe. Welcome to communicate.