2. I saw someone say that "among the 56 ethnic groups, only those with China nationality are members of the Chinese nation". Does this "nation" refer to New China or the Republic of China? But what should we do before the founding of the Republic of China and New China?
A: The Chinese nation itself is a "nation", but it is not a real "nation". This is just a political slogan and cannot be applied to the historical view. Therefore, history cannot go against the current situation. Now many ethnic groups have China nationality, that is to say, they are already from China, but they will not be considered as China people until they have China nationality and don't consider themselves as China people, even though most ethnic groups consider themselves as China people. It must be recognized by the original China people and must be China-oriented. That's why they once thought they were from China, but they were not considered as a part of China's history, because the former China people who lived in China headquarters at that time refused to admit it. If the former China people at that time also admitted that South Korea could have joined the China people, the situation would be completely different.
3. Some people say that "among the 56 ethnic groups, only those that happened in China can be regarded as the history of China, and those are not counted". Then, I would like to ask, the territory of China is different from dynasty to dynasty. How to define "within China"? And how to classify the same nation as "differences at home and abroad"? Only some people live outside China or China.
A: This is a very good question! The so-called "China" means that you truly believe that you are China, and other countries also admit that you have been sinicized (but if you are the first Han regime that claimed to be China, you don't need foreign recognition), so you can call it the China regime, such as the Qing Dynasty (the real name of the Qing Dynasty was passed on to the Qing Dynasty for policy reasons, and the real name was deliberately ignored). After the Holy Father, the Qing Dynasty called itself China in all foreign documents, indicating that the rulers of the Qing Dynasty already thought they were from China. Therefore, the Qing Dynasty at that time can be regarded as the history of China, but it can only be included in the history of China until now. As for Liaoxia, he claimed to be China, called "Northern Dynasty" and called Song Dynasty "Southern Dynasty", but Song Dynasty did not recognize Liaoxia as China, and Jinyuan did not know whether he thought of China. If not, it doesn't count. If so, it will not count if it was not recognized by the original China people at that time. You need to read historical materials to know this.
Back to the question, China refers to the territory of the China regime that meets the above conditions. As for why split into domestic and overseas? Just deliberately misleading Guan Shi for the sake of modern policy.
4. "The so-called territory in China refers to the present new China". Doesn't this mean that the territory of ancient China was not taken seriously? And if the territory of China changes again in the future, should we take the territory of modern China seriously?
A: As you said, the current situation simply ignores China's identity and historical changes in its territory. The territory of modern China is as big as our map shows, but it may not be big or small in ancient times. Only the "China definition" that meets my third answer can be called the China regime, and outside the China regime, it is a foreign country. So now, in order to satisfy politics, ignore the changes of the territory and identity of ancient China, and even forcibly delimit the territory of modern China to ancient times, there will be such a fallacy that "the territory of modern China is the scope of the history of ancient China".
5. Someone replied that "the historical view changes with the times or objects". From this perspective, the view of history is equivalent to writing for politics or a certain purpose; In this case, everyone is right today, and there is nothing wrong with what Koreans say in Korea. So why study history?
A: That's right. This is the current situation. We should not be misled by this concept for political purposes. We should study history with respect and never impose modern conditions on ancient times.
6. If the ethnic group "mostly" belongs to China and has a sense of identity, it can be counted as a part of China's history, but it was not before. People who have China nationality are all "China people". Are they "individuals"? Moreover, the Chinese nation has not been combined with the history of China, because one is to achieve inspiring slogans, and the other is history.
A: Yes! A nation can be counted as the history of China only when most people think that they are from China and most people originally think that they are from China. Look at each era carefully, and you can see this truth. Although there is a question of whether an ancient nation came from China in every era, it has not been recorded in the history of China because it doesn't think it is from China at all and most former China people refuse to admit it. In fact, most of the Sixteenth National Congress of Liao, Jin, Xixia and Wuhu were not considered as a part of China's history, because they didn't think they were China at all, and the original China people didn't even admit that they were China at that time. Until modern times, in order to cater to the policy, they directly instilled the education that "56 ethnic groups have been the history of China since ancient times", which would cause modern people to incorporate all the 16 countries of Liao, Jin, Xixia and Wuhu into the historical regime of China.
I think you have a good idea of the Chinese nation! Individuals, not the whole nation.
You can ask questions that are different from the education instilled today, which shows that you are a careful person. I believe that you can really learn history soon, and I believe that you can clearly distinguish between "concepts that stand the test of time" and "concepts that are instilled for a certain purpose"! Come on!