Because of my age, I didn't catch up with that fashion. But to be honest, I saw a girl's back and said, "What's bothering you? Leave me alone! " "Walking in the street, still feel very tasty. It is meaningless to say "turn clothes into culture", because clothes are culture, and so is the so-called clothing culture. No one can deny that clothes from being naked to putting on bark and then turning bark into today's dazzling fashion are all cultures. In the cultural upsurge of that year, people found more than 500 definitions of culture. I think the explanation of cultural concepts is close to the essence: culture is a relatively stable behavior pattern formed by people in the long-term historical accumulation. Many people think that culture is to know words, such as "you have no culture", which may indicate that he has too little literacy. This is not bad, but it is far from understanding culture as historical materials, historical documents and historical laws. If the bricks and bamboo slips in the history museum are culture, can it be destroyed by burning the museum? The ancient books and cultural relics we see are just one of the carriers of culture. And it is relatively minor. The main carrier of culture is the individual life of human beings, and culture can be passed down through the continuation and reproduction of life. If bricks and bamboo slips are also carriers of culture, then they are only used to help human memory and are auxiliary carriers of culture. The human way of life is culture itself. All the achievements made and accumulated by human beings in the process of exploring nature have finally evolved into a way of life and spread through the reproduction of human individual life. This is the real culture. Culture is human itself, that is, human behavior patterns. Culture manifests itself internally as a stable psychological state of human individuals and externally as a relatively stable behavior pattern of specific groups. To destroy a culture, we can only destroy individual human life as a cultural carrier, otherwise no one can destroy this culture. Marking certain cultural symbols on the "culture" of clothes makes the culture of clothes become a "super culture", probably a "cultural shirt". I have seen many kinds of "cultural shirts", but it is the first time for me to see such cultural shirts as "absolute power leads to absolute corruption", "freedom, equality and human rights", "building political civilization", "insisting on telling the truth from now on" and "give me liberty or give me death". I am very touched every time I see it. Wearing such "cultural shirts" on the streets, crowding buses and going to supermarkets is not so much fashion as a call for fashion-I hope freedom and human rights will become a part of people's fashion life. In the final analysis, such a T-shirt is to make the concept promoted by the T-shirt become people's life itself. Since culture is human life itself, wearing such a cultural shirt is equivalent to telling people that these advertised ideas are the way people should live. What makes me sad is that freedom and human rights can only be printed on clothes as a cultural symbol. First of all, putting on a "cultural shirt" is, after all, an addiction to freedom and human rights.