Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Chinese History - Brief introduction of Heinrich Von Sybel
Brief introduction of Heinrich Von Sybel
Heinrich Von Sybel

Heinrichvonsybel (1817-1895) is also translated as Zuber or Subert.

Chinese name: Heinrich Von Sybel.

Heinrich von sberg

Nationality: Germany

Date of birth: 18 17

Date of death: 1895

Occupation: historian

Major achievements: one of the founders of Prussian School.

Representative works: The first cross-military history, the appearance of the German crown.

outline

HeinrichvonSybel, male, 18 17- 1895. Historian, one of the founders of Prussian School. Born in a noble family in Dü sseldorf.

personal record

Berlin University, studied under Friedrich Carl von Savign and Leopold von Ranke.

184 1 year settled in Bonn. 1844 Professor at Bonn University, Marburg University and Munich University.

1848- 1849 is a member of the hessian parliament and a member of the frankfurt preparatory meeting.

1850 is a member of the Parliament of Erfort League.

186 1 year Professor of Bonn University.

1862- 1864 was a member of the prussian parliament, a member of the national liberal party, and an opponent of Bismarck in the constitutional dispute.

1867 Member of the Federal Parliament of North Germany.

1875- 1895 was the director of the national archives of the German Empire.

Major achievements

He learned the critical method of evaluating historical data from Frank. His first book, The First Military History of the Cross (184 1), is one of the most outstanding works of the Frank School, and The Generation of the German Crown (1844) also belongs to the same type of history books. Soon, his interest in politics led him to leave the aristocratic school. Although he later taught in Marburg, Munich, Bosnia and Herzegovina and other universities, he claimed that four out of seven were politicians and three out of seven were professors. In the parliament, he argued that Prussia had the mission of leading the German states towards unification, opposed feudalism and medieval imperial policies, and finally supported Marx. His historical theory and works clearly show his political views. In his lecture on University and Politics (1847), he said that every subject should be deeply involved in public politics and pay attention to the value of each subject to state affairs. In his speech "The Position and Function of History" (1856), he denied that the ideal of historians lies in "neutrality", and advocated that historians should introduce national ideals in religion and politics to readers, that historians should have a historical conscience, and that politics is the first duty of historians. In view of 1848 the socialist trend of thought shown by the radicals in the European Revolution, he decided to write a book to explain the consequences of socialism in the French Revolution. So he spent more than 20 years writing a magnum opus (1789- 1800 history of revolutionary times) (5 volumes, 1853- 1879). This book shows that he is strongly opposed to the revolution.