The knowledge points are not obvious, but you do so few questions that you have no idea what it wants to test you. Every time the teacher finishes the exam, he will say that this question is for you ... you should remember the way of each question. If you do more, you will naturally understand the meaning, and when you do this kind of problem again, you will understand the intention of the questioner. Sometimes we don't test knowledge itself, although knowledge is the basis of the test, but more often, it is to test our understanding of the topic. If you only recite the answer, you will not be able to understand the meaning and connotation of the topic, and the answer you make will certainly not get the most satisfactory result.
Answering questions in liberal arts is actually a way to test people's judgment on logical thinking, but because liberal arts is not like science, its answers are extensive and vary from person to person. You can't say that some people's answers are wrong. In order to facilitate the unified marking, teachers will adopt a fixed answering routine, so as long as you know the fixed answering routine and understand the meaning of the topic, you can achieve good results according to the materials and background given to you by the topic. For the knowledge point itself, there is no need to remember.
Because sometimes, even if you are very familiar with this history, you will often make mistakes if you have a wrong understanding of the topic. Then when the teacher explains it to you, you will suddenly realize. Therefore, we should try our best to grasp the ideas of the questioner, analyze the relevant materials given by the topic, and analyze why they are given to you and what the materials are for, instead of seeing the topic first and then thinking about how to use those knowledge points. We say that the exam is about knowledge points, but also about your ability to use and analyze knowledge points. If you don't have any analytical skills, you can't make rational use of resources.