Why does Jordan recognize Curry's historical position higher than Durant's? The king who leads the times is irreplaceable? First of all, he believes that Curry's three-pointers have brought different ways to win the league, and it is precisely because of Curry's existence that the league's three-pointers have been promoted to a very high level. After all, Curry brought the little ball era in the league, and it's great to know how to create an era.
Secondly, the style of the ball in the garage can be switched at will. There is a completely different way of playing when you have the ball and when you don't have the ball. Therefore, Curry is different from the league's game style, and it is also a point to improve his status.
In the end, Durant played against Curry, and Curry led the Warriors to beat Durant when the Warriors were two games behind. Moreover, judging from the counterpoint between the two, it is actually very difficult for Durant to defend Curry. Basically, Durant couldn't stop Curry from scoring after several rounds of defense.
But in fact, everyone's evaluation of a player is different, and the starting point and consideration of their evaluation are different. As the saying goes, there must be a thousand different Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand people. But in any case, Durant and Curry have become historical players and left many unforgettable games in the league.