Whether adobe houses should be kept depends on the specific situation:
1. Dangerous houses should be demolished immediately. Most adobe houses were built before 1970s and 1980s. Due to wind and rain erosion, they were seriously damaged due to untimely maintenance. The owner left his family behind and became a dangerous house. Some houses that have collapsed or are collapsing should be demolished urgently. Otherwise, many people have to bear corresponding responsibilities in case of safety accidents, involving criminal, civil and administrative scope.
2 The safe adobe house that the owner is willing to demolish should be demolished. Re-planting in time, there is no need to keep it.
3. At present, it is not possible to dismantle the safe earthen houses (except those planned to be demolished). This kind of earthen house can be used as a production house if it is well managed, and it should be demolished in time once there are potential safety hazards.
4. The characteristic farmhouses gathered together should be preserved. This kind of earthen house should be maintained and protected, and the rural folk customs should be preserved to add luster to the rural revitalization.
5. Earth houses with tourism potential should be kept. Adobe houses with stories and themes may become the source of future wealth.
This matter has just been put on the agenda recently. The house in my hometown has been in disrepair for a long time and has become the only one in the village. I have the heart to repair it.
Repair, not live.
That is a sign, an idea, and we must keep it. If you don't go back, you can only run around the village, and there is nowhere to stay.
That is the most perfect retreat given by the country. City people can only drink red bull when they are sleepy and tired. We rural people can go back to raise cattle when they are sleepy and tired. With this, we can dump people in the city for a few blocks! !
Those with certain architectural style, national characteristics or commemorative significance should be preserved for future generations to understand, which is also a cultural heritage.
Rural land is the lifeblood and must be protected.
Now the changes in the countryside are getting bigger and bigger, the use of rural land is also standardized, and many adobe houses are being demolished.
Adobe houses, mostly built of mud bricks, are likely to collapse because of the irregular construction methods in the past. At present, there is no policy that all adobe houses in rural areas should be demolished. However, if there are houses with potential safety hazards, it is suggested to rebuild or rebuild the houses.
In the past, building houses in rural areas was relatively random, and almost no one was in charge. Just finding a piece of land to build a house will affect the planning of the village. Even those built on cultivated land are illegal buildings, so it is recommended to demolish them.
Homeless houses, the death of some family members and the emigration of registered permanent residence. , resulting in uninhabited houses or no owners. Suggest demolition
The picture above shows an adobe house with historical value. It is recommended to keep or repair. The house above is about 200 years old. )
Most adobe houses in rural areas were built in 1970s and 1980s, because the building materials are civil structures. Most farmers who still live in rural areas have been transformed into bungalows or brick-concrete buildings.
Most of the remaining earthen houses are the old houses of farmers who bought commercial houses in the city. It is generally abandoned and idle, and it has been in disrepair for a long time. Outside the yard, there are many weeds.
Now the village committees of the township government are carrying out environmental improvement and beautifying the living environment. I think these successful people who have entered the city and started businesses abroad should also consider it. They should respond to the government's call and either dismantle or repair it. In short, don't put on a posture that I don't answer who dares to move, and let these outdated and useless dilapidated adobe houses affect the pace of new rural construction.
I don't think it is necessary to keep rural adobe houses unless they have special historical significance.
Old houses are resolutely left behind, and modern dangerous houses are suggested to be demolished.
Dangerous houses should be demolished, otherwise it will be dangerous. Mine should be demolished.
Alas, there is no money to repair it.