In fact, at the earliest time, the court set up the position of "living official", which is obvious from the name. To put it bluntly, follow the monarch (not the emperor) every day and write down what the monarch says and does. Moreover, the early historians had great power and could top the emperor in recording history.

For example, after Sima Qian wrote Historical Records, there was a lot of discussion in later generations, saying that historians should not be treated like that and let them write anything, so you see, Historical Records can write down Liu Bang's rogue face and put it in the official history. And later generations are basically gone.

After the imperial power was strengthened, the supervision of the literati class was strengthened, and they were very concerned about historical records. Especially in this dynasty. There are detailed records of the previous dynasty, and everything about the royal family has been written down, and some of them have even been greatly derogated to prove that it is correct for the former dynasty to replace the former dynasty. But on the one hand, it also restored some true colors of history. It is not reliable to say that the history of the Qing Dynasty is made up by the Qing people themselves, which is different from the official history of previous dynasties.

Whether there are historians in Shu is controversial in history. The History of the Three Kingdoms says that there were no historians when Zhuge Liang ruled Shu. As for what it is, it's hard to understand. /question/22611449.html This article has certain reference significance.

Furthermore, even without historians, Longzhong is so beneficial to Zhuge Liang. Of course, it is necessary to publicize things to boost the morale of the scholar-bureaucrat class (after all, Zhuge Liang is a typical representative of the scholar-bureaucrat class that you have been loyal and admired for thousands of years, and is a model of the scholar-bureaucrat class), and even have to say yes.