But is history really like this? Everyone believes in history books, but they are also written by later generations. If you want to know the truth, you still need to analyze whether there is any discrepancy between history books and history.
Hello, I'm Saint Shi Jun. I like to tell you history in Sao, so please pay attention to my friends and support them!
1. Cao: The loyal Cao was the first brother who followed Liu Bang's uprising and devoted himself to Liu Bang along the way. Liu Bang's uprising was suppressed. The Sichuan government and Sichuan county army of Daqin Empire led a group of foot soldiers to surround Liu Bang. At this moment, Cao was with Liu Bang. When Liu Bang went out to fight, Cao became a pioneer officer, paving the way for Liu Bang. Cao not only opened the way for Liu Bang, but also directly took the head of the Sichuan viceroy and brought it back.
Second, it is unwise for Cao Wushang to betray Liu Bang at this time. Cao Wushang has been following Liu Bang to conquer the world. Regardless of how many feats Cao has made, take Cao as an example. He followed Liu Bang from beginning to end, so there was no credit or hard work. When the feudal lords and allied forces destroyed Qin, they once agreed with various feudal lords that whoever entered the customs first would be king! Cao Wushang is not stupid enough to betray Liu Bang when rewarding him. If the reward is based on merit, Cao Wushang is definitely a founding father. Moreover, it is not necessary for Cao Wushang to go to Xiang Yu's camp and tell Xiang Yu:? Our boss is senior, so our boss wants to be king. Do you have any opinions? Besides, before the Qin dynasty was destroyed, everyone agreed that whoever entered the customs first would be the king, and Liu Bangzao didn't leave anything behind.
A piece of farmland, this Liu Bang is about to achieve great things, and it is impossible to rebel now! And it is well known that Liu Bang is the king. (Liu Bangxian entered Xianyang, and naturally he can be king according to the agreement. Because of a well-known thing, it is obviously not so stupid to kill his brother Liu Bang who has followed him for many years. Therefore, when Liu Bang killed Cao, it must not be as recorded in history books. Cao Wushang told Xiang Yu that Liu Bang wanted to be king before killing Cao Wushang. This shows that Cao Wushang's death must be for another reason.
Third, the death of Cao Cao's death is likely to have failed to complete Liu Bang's replacement task, thus greatly disrupting Liu Bang's plan. Liu bang entered Xianyang city, however, he must send someone to guard Hangu Pass. Cao may have been sent by Liu Bang to station in Hangu Pass. Liu bang killed Cao Wushang, which may have ruined Liu bang's great cause of ceding land to be king, and then killed Cao Wushang in a rage. What did Xiang Yu say to Liu Bang at the Hongmen banquet recorded in historical records? Cao turned it in? This is just Sima Qian's personal opinion and speculation. After all, Sima Qian was not from the Qin Dynasty!
Xiang Yu can't just invite Liu Bang's family to dinner in Xinfeng Hongmen. The Hongmen Banquet is probably a meeting after the suppression of Qin by various governors!
Everyone knows that Qin Shihuang unified the six countries and unified the princes of 800 years into the Daqin Empire. Although Qin Shihuang completed the great cause of reunification, the other six countries did not give up at the beginning of the establishment of the new regime. At the same time, the Qin dynasty also created the hatred of the six countries against the Daqin empire, and the dispute between Xiang Yu and Liu Bang was only a legacy of the six countries.
Where is Cao? In this way, he became a victim of rights.
Saint Shi Jun said: There are always many things that changed dynasties in history! And those who follow the future emperor to make great achievements? Hero? But few people get away with it. Cao is just a little earlier than Han Xin and others.