Personally, it is a historical fate that rural cultivated land will be dispersed-concentrated-dispersed. Because in ancient times, people lived in villages and needed only cultivated land near the villages, and at that time, no matter the traffic or the population, all the villages basically existed independently of each other and had little influence on each other, so there was such a decentralized trend.

However, with the continuous development of the times, in the face of the country's updated policies, the rural areas behind need to face the situation of concentration, and after concentration, each rural area can continuously stimulate its own development. Coupled with the convenience of transportation, villages can contact each other more quickly and ensure communication with each other, so concentration will be full of temptation and development potential.

However, after centralization, what needs to be faced is that the exchanges between villages become more frequent, and each village can learn from each other's strengths. Slowly, the necessity of learning from each other is decreasing. Coupled with various rural policies, more villages have chosen to decentralize. After decentralization, their respective development can not be left behind, and their strong vitality can be guaranteed.

Therefore, in my opinion, this is not only a historical fate, but also an inevitable change brought about by the development of villages over time. This is also the best way to fully satisfy the self-development of each village, so some people will judge it. This form is an inevitable trend.